Archive for July, 2007 Page 3 of 4



And the gloves are most definitely off.

So the story is – eBay, who have a 25% stake in Craigslist, decide on cloning it in the form of Kijiji, and one of our keynote conference speakers, Jose Mallabo, eBay’s Director of Financial Communications, is the official spokesman courting questions about eBay taking on Craigslist here in TheStreet – that’s the online financial magazine as opposed to the English soap opera.

You see, this conference has it going on from all angles people.

Kijiji is basically Craigslist with a lick of paint and a great map of locations on the front page. It also has better forums and an added bell and two whistles. (I’m sure Mr. Mallabo will set me right if I missed out on something on first cursory glance.) All told, if Craigslist announced a revamp and came up with Kijiji, I think most people would approve.

So, given Craigslist’s apparent laissez-faire attitude to making a dollar, is this move by eBay as cute as a braided My Little Pony or as heavy-handed as Hulk Hogan?

Read the article.

Compare Kijiji and Craigslist.

Then let the conversation commence.

Q&A with Speaker Jeff James of Microsoft

Here’s the first of our conference speaker Q&A’s from Jeff James of Microsoft whose topic for the conference is going to be: Execution for ROI: Aligning the Sales/Marketing Planets.

I actually got to meet the chap this morning and he’s a lovely fella. As you can tell from his answers he’s most definitely someone who’s on the button. And I can assure you that he’s just as engaging as he is sharp. So, I reckon you might not only learn a thing or three but you might also have a decent little informal chat after he’s done.

Jeff James of Microsoft speaker at Online Marketing: Innovations That Work
Read Jeff’s full bio here.

1. With the advent of blogging and other ’speculative investments’ related to social media, how do you go about measuring things that don’t have a bottom line such as customer loyalty, relationship and brand?

I’m not sure I would agree that those things don’t have a bottom line. In some ways, the perception that things like “brand” aren’t very measurable are the reason there has been so much waste associated with advertising. It is not always easy to find a direct measurement from awareness or brand affinity to end sale, but there are effective methods for finding strong directional correlations.

The challenge today is that many smaller firms don’t – or feel like they can’t – set aside a portion of their limited marketing budgets to actually measure their efforts. Larger companies are finally beginning to mandate a testing phase of any major campaign so they can optimize their investment and test which sets of messages or media channels are working to drive financial results.

2. How can businesses on smaller budgets target their marketing more effectively?

It begins with understanding their customers better. It’s surprising that the smaller companies who have less to waste actually do less than bigger companies (who have more room for error in many cases) to deeply profile and target their customers. A small company or a company with a smaller budget should spend a significant amount more time thinking about their highest ROI customer scenario.

It begins very simply with documenting customer scenarios, or personas. Who are your most loyal customers? Who are your most profitable? Hopefully they are the same, but not always. Document what these profitable customers do, what they want, where they go. Document what they read, who influences them, what their future needs are. Learn everything you can about them via surveys, on-site visits or other low-cost tactics. Don’t just let an agency do it for you; have your executive team go out and meet customers, and they’ll be surprised by what they observe that is very actionable when it comes to targeting.

Once you have that level of customer knowledge and intimacy, targeting becomes a much easier task.

3. Which communication channels (web, TV, radio, direct mail, etc.) do you consider to provide the best ROI for smaller businesses?

That is probably a dangerous question, because it might lead someone to assume that one channel is better than the others in a general sense. In reality, it depends on a lot of things – the audience you’re targeting, the product/service you’re selling, etc. And more importantly, in most cases, research has demonstrated very clearly that a MIX of communication channels is more effective than using just one channel. Each media channel plays an important role in building a “sum is bigger than its parts” effect. For example, a direct mail campaign that is backed up by radio awareness sees higher results than just a DM piece by itself.

The Internet of course plays several different media roles – awareness, branding, direct response and search. So even within one media realm, you have to think of it very holistically in order to get the best results.

4. How do you see marketing in relation to the aforementioned communication channels developing in the near future?

Consumers have the power in today’s world. So marketing must shift to become an honest, responsive dialogue with customers vs. a one-way mass communication approach. Companies are struggling with the reality of losing this power, but the evidence is absolutely there. The most successful marketers today are the ones who use marketing to create a story that consumers want to hear and share, and one that they can contribute to. There will always be a place for quick hit announcement-style marketing (“big sale on Saturday”), but it is losing its relevance outside of a well-established customer relationship.

5. What do you think are the benefits of holding conferences such as Online Marketing: Innovations That Work in places such as Western PA, Eastern OH, and West Virginia?

I think it can only benefit companies in the region who may not have the benefit of hearing these insights in “big media” markets such as NY or San Francisco. The faster we can bring proven marketing innovations to the region, the faster companies can begin growing faster and more profitably. The opportunity to meet peers and begin sharing learning among local companies, the faster everyone will learn and be able to take advantage.

Sales-Stalk

This past couple of weeks I’ve been doing a spot of furniture shopping and there’s been at least one thing in common with a certain portion of furniture salespeople – they’ve got limpet tendencies.

Is there any situation you can recall where you’re cock-a-hoop over anybody, whether it be a better half, a pooch, or a salesperson appearing from every nook and cranny to either surprise, lick, or ‘just see how you’re doing’.

If only we could take out injunctions against stalking salesmen with stale aftershave in the same way we can with an ex who’s determined to get themselves back in your good books by setting fire to your belongings.

It comes as no surprise that people aren’t overly keen on being pestered by advertisers on their cell phones either. According to this article:

Nearly two-thirds of mobile phone owners said their phones were very personal to them. Mobile users also had definite preferences about what types of ads they found acceptable.

acceptable mobile ad types
70% deleted ads as soon as they saw them.
Mobile action on ads

And here’s the projected spend:
Mobile Advertising Spend

eMarketer Senior Analyst John Gauntt predicted how the US mobile ad market will develop:

“After a lot of hand-wringing and some spectacular successes — as well as flameouts — mobile operators, brands and consumers will learn from each other about what works and what does not work, just like they did for online.”

Here’s what works for me – while I understand everybody has to put food on the table, I fall into the two-thirds majority described above. I very rarely even bat an eyelid at any form of advertising or unsolicited sales approach. In fact, I make a determined effort to avoid individuals or companies that use these tactics.

I might very well be an awkward customer, but the advent of the internet has at least allowed me to become an empowered shopper with the ability to garner more information about a product or service than your average salesperson might possess. I want information that I determine to be relevant as opposed to weird pop-ups and texts that cost me a quarter to view.

If I’m looking for a chair, I’m governed simply by aesthetics and price – my backside knows if it’s comfortable or not. I also might buy into a brand or I might not. A good salesperson will point me in the right direction and inform me of anything I might not know and be of benefit to me in the buying process. A bad one will follow me around like a bad smell hoping for a sale or at least some contact information.

Saying that, I’m a sucker for a fantastic sales pitch!

The Train Hasn’t Yet Left Every Station

How many people do you know who are looking for that killer online idea wanting to be the next [insert name of web company bought by search engine giant for 57 times its actual worth here]?

If only they’d spend a couple of hours researching their brain-toot online instead of wasting more of your or their time than is absolutely necessary. After all, it’s only some lame Youtube clone done in frontpage that requires the user to email the video to the webmaster before it crashes some cheap server.

CNN has 25 startups to watch covering all your fancy Web 2.0 pioneers from StumbleUpon to SimulScribe in a range of categories.

One of the interesting things is the amount of money some of them had as backing. Nobody seems to have been funded by less than $750,000 and nobody seems to have come up with a bone-headed idea either.

But the thing is, instead of wanting to retire on the backend of a new Myspace, why not consider how elements of this kind of software can benefit your business online. There are still plenty of industry niches and geographical areas that are yet to catch on to Web 1.0. That isn’t to belittle said industries or areas, it’s just a fact that your average Web 2.0 type tends to forget.

And that’s as good a reason I can think of for attending conferences such as Online Marketing: Innovations That Work in areas such as Pittsburgh.

It isn’t just about having a web presence or getting that web presence found; it’s also about ways of building communities and developing conversations with your customers – wherever you may be.

How to take over the world by keeping schtum

Looking at the iPhone as an alpha, it’s a heck of a feat. Gorgeous. Groundbreaking. Full of promise and a lot of delivery. Unfortunately, we’re paying for a full-release version.

[via][from]

Obviously Google gets on with Apple a whole lot better than it does with Ebay, unless their last attempt at crashing a party left them smarting like a roundly spanked buttock. It seems everybody has managed to do everything with the iPhone this weekend apart from marry it or eat it. There’s also been an inordinate amount of mindless guff spouted about it; and all the while Google has been quietly going about its business building the mother of all telecommunications infrastructures.

As Apple changes the world one slogan at a time, Google does it in a state of denial. Here’s a few interesting snippets from an even more interesting article relating to what they’re putting together:

“They have enough potential capacity to compete in wholesale telecommunications or as an Internet service provider,” says Eric Schoonover, senior analyst at Washington, D.C.-based TeleGeography Research, a consultancy that tracks fibre holdings.

The company [Google] is estimated to have between 40 and 70 data centres filled to the brim with computing and storage power, with at least five new facilities under construction in the United States alone. By comparison, Canada’s second-largest telephone company Telus Corp., has eight.

The search company is building its data centres next to hydroelectric facilities in order to feed their huge power needs, he said. All that capability will soon be turned against telephone and cable companies, which is why firms such as Telus and Bell need to merge — they’ll need the extra girth to mount a defence against Google.

“They’re looking to come in and completely usurp the telcos at both the business level and the consumer level,” Mr. Entwistle said.

It’s quite obvious that Google are up to something and I’m presuming they aren’t acquiring all this infrastructure just to do a spot of telco-squatting. And have Google just bought out GrandCentral, a voice communications management solutions company, because they had a bit of spare cash lying about?

It could be said that if Apple is trying to change the world then Google is trying to take it over. I’m not averse to a universe dependent on all things Google and I’m sure they might even make quite a decent fist of being a telecommunications behemoth. I know that I’d rather sign with them than AT&T or Time Warner.

You must, however, question what is going on in principal.

We got a bit of a taste of the bitter pill that could be Google world domination over the Sicko debacle this week. They started by offering to counter Sicko searches with health industry ads, then they got called on it, then they went into full retraction mode sending employees off to watch Michael Moore’s film – I sincerely hope during work hours.

But, thinking on, Google world domination would have none of the three elements above. They’d simply be doing it all in secret and manipulating results to show the highest bidder. Google has every right to have somebody make a mistake on one of their blogs and retract it after other forces on the internet kick up a bit of a stink. So long as we have an internet along those lines then I think we’re going to be just fine.

I bet Google just wished they could hire somebody with a Phd in common sense.