Archive for the 'Mobile Marketing' Category

Underage Mobile Marketing

We have reasons as to why we can’t do certain things until we are of a certain age. I’m fairly sure I don’t have to list the majority of them.

I find marketing to those who we have deemed to be financially immature in a legal sense to be amoral at best and immoral at worst.

As this article points out:

Protecting children under the age of 13 was one of the biggest issues addressed by the latest Mobile Marketing Association Consumer Best Practices Guidelines released on July 17. [report pdf]

The guidelines are there because there’s obviously a school of thought that believes children should be protected from over-zealous marketing. However, the only suggestions the article highlights are the use of ‘exhortative language’ such as ‘only’ and ‘just’ and adding mandatory double opt-ins when using interactive voice response or the mobile Web.

As effectiveness goes, we’re probably talking ashtrays on motorbikes.

I know the argument that children are going to spend their money on something, and who is anyone to dictate what that something may be. Children especially love their phones. They should have access to ringtones and other assorted modifications that suit their lifestyle choices and represent who they are as little people just like the big people. It’s their choice. It’s up to marketing associations to decide the moral boundaries as to what can or cannot be peddled.

In fact, this has more to do with the morality of marketers than those being marketed to.

But, I’ll ask anyone to find me someone under the age of thirteen who is able to purchase an iPhone and sign a two-year contract with AT&T independently without requiring a co-signer or raiding the ‘mom bank’. (Spoiled little brats with monstrous trust funds in place that they’ve been able to access since birth don’t count.)

Find me a child along those lines and then we can have a discussion.

Q&A with Jeff Ostiguy of G8wave on Mobile Marketing

Jeff Ostiguy of G8Wave: speaker at Online MArketing: Innovations that Work

Jeff Ostiguy is the Vice President of Business Development at g8wave, an integrated mobile media company with offices in Boston, Los Angeles and London. He’s our keynote speaker on mobile marketing – in other words, he’ll be discussing how advertisers are using mobile technology and cell phones to reach customers from anywhere, at anytime.

1. Mobile marketing allows companies to advertise to people on their cell phones and other mobile devices. What are the major types of mobile marketing in place today?

As much as you read about the devices themselves and all their capabilities, the major driver at this point is still simple SMS or text messaging. Keep in mind, the more important factor is the sophistication of the consumer. Using text to build databases, deliver special offers, news and coupons is simple. If done right, it’s valuable, contextual and accessible for everyone – virtually every phone can send or receive text. And its not hard for the user.

The majority of what you’re seeing now are simple “text in” type campaigns that put people on a list or deliver them instant offers or information. Little by little you’re starting to see more of the mobile web and content (images, sounds, video) in conjunction with commercial mobile programs as well.

2. What are the main benefits for businesses incorporating mobile marketing into their mix?

Interactivity anywhere and ubiquitous access to their consumer. Think about a print ad or non traditional placements like billboards or sponsorships. In the case of a print ad, it’s call or go online for sponsorships, sometimes nothing. Fewer and fewer people want to talk to someone on the phone or are trying to avoid some sort of automated system and they aren’t always able to get online…BUT they always have their phone and they can always text or visit a mobile website. It’s easy and takes just seconds to act on that impulse and interact with the message using their mobile phone. We’re always telling our clients, think about everything saying “call, go online or text”, it needs to become the 3rd channel.

Once you start collecting those numbers you have an extremely valuable, engaged audience to push out valuably timely messages. Plus there are no spam filters. You can be virtually 100% sure they will get the message and studies have shown that almost 95% of all messages are
ready immediately.


3. Mobile marketing is still in its infancy and has plenty of legs left. What do you consider the most exciting developments in this marketing medium?

Well, in the short term, I’m encouraged by greater use of the mobile web. I think people are finally starting to realize how powerful it can be and the kind of access it provides.

Down the line, you start to think about location and proximity based tools that will be extremely powerful. However, we must tread lightly. If done right, proximity marketing can and will be extremely valuable and effective, but I don’t think I have to point out all the potential pitfalls. It must be developed with the ultimate level of consumer control in mind.

4. Any thoughts on the iPhone?

Oh god, is this where I’m supposed to say something controversial? Let’s wait and see. I have had a chance to play with them – they seem like very solid devices. We’ll have to wait and see the ultimate impact. They’re very expensive. Many people are still looking for a good inexpensive phone. Plus there is churn, is it worth switching carriers, what if I already have an iPod?

5. What do you think are the benefits of holding conferences like Online Marketing: Innovations that Work in places such as Pittsburgh?

For me, and I’ve spoken at a number of these kinds of things – newspaper conferences, CTIA, AMA – it’s really about eliminating all the mystery surrounding mobile and making people realize that with the right partner it can be very simple (and not as expensive as they think) and
that it’s not just about young kids – mobile if applied correctly will
drive adoption.

6. How can businesses serving clients on a local or regional level use mobile marketing?

The same way they can nationally really. It’s really about creating a new channel for themselves, much like the web, just much, much more personal.

Sales-Stalk

This past couple of weeks I’ve been doing a spot of furniture shopping and there’s been at least one thing in common with a certain portion of furniture salespeople – they’ve got limpet tendencies.

Is there any situation you can recall where you’re cock-a-hoop over anybody, whether it be a better half, a pooch, or a salesperson appearing from every nook and cranny to either surprise, lick, or ‘just see how you’re doing’.

If only we could take out injunctions against stalking salesmen with stale aftershave in the same way we can with an ex who’s determined to get themselves back in your good books by setting fire to your belongings.

It comes as no surprise that people aren’t overly keen on being pestered by advertisers on their cell phones either. According to this article:

Nearly two-thirds of mobile phone owners said their phones were very personal to them. Mobile users also had definite preferences about what types of ads they found acceptable.

acceptable mobile ad types
70% deleted ads as soon as they saw them.
Mobile action on ads

And here’s the projected spend:
Mobile Advertising Spend

eMarketer Senior Analyst John Gauntt predicted how the US mobile ad market will develop:

“After a lot of hand-wringing and some spectacular successes — as well as flameouts — mobile operators, brands and consumers will learn from each other about what works and what does not work, just like they did for online.”

Here’s what works for me – while I understand everybody has to put food on the table, I fall into the two-thirds majority described above. I very rarely even bat an eyelid at any form of advertising or unsolicited sales approach. In fact, I make a determined effort to avoid individuals or companies that use these tactics.

I might very well be an awkward customer, but the advent of the internet has at least allowed me to become an empowered shopper with the ability to garner more information about a product or service than your average salesperson might possess. I want information that I determine to be relevant as opposed to weird pop-ups and texts that cost me a quarter to view.

If I’m looking for a chair, I’m governed simply by aesthetics and price – my backside knows if it’s comfortable or not. I also might buy into a brand or I might not. A good salesperson will point me in the right direction and inform me of anything I might not know and be of benefit to me in the buying process. A bad one will follow me around like a bad smell hoping for a sale or at least some contact information.

Saying that, I’m a sucker for a fantastic sales pitch!

How to take over the world by keeping schtum

Looking at the iPhone as an alpha, it’s a heck of a feat. Gorgeous. Groundbreaking. Full of promise and a lot of delivery. Unfortunately, we’re paying for a full-release version.

[via][from]

Obviously Google gets on with Apple a whole lot better than it does with Ebay, unless their last attempt at crashing a party left them smarting like a roundly spanked buttock. It seems everybody has managed to do everything with the iPhone this weekend apart from marry it or eat it. There’s also been an inordinate amount of mindless guff spouted about it; and all the while Google has been quietly going about its business building the mother of all telecommunications infrastructures.

As Apple changes the world one slogan at a time, Google does it in a state of denial. Here’s a few interesting snippets from an even more interesting article relating to what they’re putting together:

“They have enough potential capacity to compete in wholesale telecommunications or as an Internet service provider,” says Eric Schoonover, senior analyst at Washington, D.C.-based TeleGeography Research, a consultancy that tracks fibre holdings.

The company [Google] is estimated to have between 40 and 70 data centres filled to the brim with computing and storage power, with at least five new facilities under construction in the United States alone. By comparison, Canada’s second-largest telephone company Telus Corp., has eight.

The search company is building its data centres next to hydroelectric facilities in order to feed their huge power needs, he said. All that capability will soon be turned against telephone and cable companies, which is why firms such as Telus and Bell need to merge — they’ll need the extra girth to mount a defence against Google.

“They’re looking to come in and completely usurp the telcos at both the business level and the consumer level,” Mr. Entwistle said.

It’s quite obvious that Google are up to something and I’m presuming they aren’t acquiring all this infrastructure just to do a spot of telco-squatting. And have Google just bought out GrandCentral, a voice communications management solutions company, because they had a bit of spare cash lying about?

It could be said that if Apple is trying to change the world then Google is trying to take it over. I’m not averse to a universe dependent on all things Google and I’m sure they might even make quite a decent fist of being a telecommunications behemoth. I know that I’d rather sign with them than AT&T or Time Warner.

You must, however, question what is going on in principal.

We got a bit of a taste of the bitter pill that could be Google world domination over the Sicko debacle this week. They started by offering to counter Sicko searches with health industry ads, then they got called on it, then they went into full retraction mode sending employees off to watch Michael Moore’s film – I sincerely hope during work hours.

But, thinking on, Google world domination would have none of the three elements above. They’d simply be doing it all in secret and manipulating results to show the highest bidder. Google has every right to have somebody make a mistake on one of their blogs and retract it after other forces on the internet kick up a bit of a stink. So long as we have an internet along those lines then I think we’re going to be just fine.

I bet Google just wished they could hire somebody with a Phd in common sense.

Phone Advertising Oozes Potential

The last time I camped out overnight for something was for a free Morrisey gig in Wolverhampton sometime during December 1988. You only needed to don a Smiths t-shirt and you were guaranteed entry. Unfortunately I must’ve nodded off at some point as I woke at 8.00 AM with about 2,534 sweaty box room rebels ahead of me whereas there’d only been a handful when I arrived. But, William, it was really nothing.

With this painful memory still fresh and as a borderline narcoleptic, I decided against queuing for any amount of time for any kind of iPhone this past Friday. I mean, seriously, is there anything the iPhone does that my Treo 700wx can’t do slightly better and a damn sight cheaper? Apart from look dreadfully stunning, that is.

Anyway, irrespective of what current phone you do or do not have and whether you think you’ve made history this weekend by throwing $600 at a glorified iPod that makes telephone calls, there’s an interesting report from Research Brief talking about mobile video and its potential for advertising revenue.

Telephia recently announced the latest research from the Mobile Video Report, showing that mobile TV/video subscription revenues grew 198% year-over-year to $146 million in Q1 2007. There were 8.4 million mobile video subscribers last quarter with penetration doubling to nearly four percent since Q1 2006.

In Q1 2007, revenues for mobile audio music totaled $239 million (including realtones, ringtones and full track music). There were 27 million mobile subscribers who downloaded audio on their phones in Q1, as compared to 19 million during the same time last year. Moreover, nearly 29 million mobile video consumers logged onto the mobile Web in March 2007, a penetration rate of about 12 percent.

With the latest news surrounding the iPhone features, and another quarter of impressive subscriber growth, mobile video is rapidly becoming a significant new media distribution platform, concludes the report.

That’s just a little snippet. You can find the full post with added stats for full effect here.